At the same time, sentencing a young person raises questions about age, maturity, and the possibility of change. Teenagers can make extremely serious decisions and must take responsibility when their actions cause significant harm. But adolescence is also a time of major development. Judgment, emotional maturity, decision-making, and understanding of long-term consequences can continue to develop well into adulthood. Recognizing this does not mean excusing harmful behavior.

An 86-year sentence can potentially mean that a teenager spends most of their adult life in prison. That raises an important question about rehabilitation. A young person may change significantly over the years through education, counseling, mentorship, family support, and personal responsibility. This does not mean every offender will change, or that public safety should ever be ignored. It simply recognizes that people who commit offenses at a young age may not remain the same person decades later.

Ultimately, the discussion is not about choosing between accountability and compassion. Both can matter. Justice should recognize victims, protect society, and provide meaningful consequences while also considering the developmental reality of youth. An 86-year sentence is more than a number—it raises broader questions about what we want justice to accomplish..